It is critical for educators to recognize the fact-checking that a company’s AI is subjected to before implementation to avoid any material that has a biased view.
FREMONT, CA: Today, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is part of everything that one does—from news, education, healthcare to banking—AI is used everywhere. AI is also tasked with following up on emails, assisting in online search, and setting reminders. Ample digital information is available online, and most people rely on keywords to search for applications and other data.
Impact of Artificial Intelligence’s on Fact-Checking in Schools
AI is impacting education industry like never before by changing the curriculum, eliminating administrative tasks for educators, and shaping instructional delivery. Another role for AI is in the classrooms; the fact-checker that all schools need.
Artificial Intelligence acts as an analytical assistant and a learning companion along with teaching students and providing them with opportunities to practice the skills. Also, AI analyzes and collects learning data for educators to use in planning their instruction.
Allowing EdTech companies to take on the education market with biased intelligence will distort the whole curriculum and the teaching. If the fact-checking of the businesses boost their product to the extent of keeping out any other creation, then there is a high-risk of schools losing fairness while teaching any subject.
The Future of AI Fact-Checking
Most of the businesses identify the advantage that the AI gives them over their competitors who do not incorporate artificial intelligence. Supervisors consider AI as a strategic priority, and they aim to use it to place themselves as market leaders.
Artificial Intelligence boosts instructions and improves teacher efficiency, and so not all AI is harmful. Educators who recognize how some EdTech companies manipulate AI for corporate gains should be prepared to select the objective product that has been fact-checked without bias. After all, the future of children depends on the organization’s aptitude to preserve the objectivity in learner’s instruction and curriculum.