Technology Changes to Supply Chains Demand Good Leadership
Hidden Costs of Outsourcing and Offshoring for Financial Services...
Procurement Transformation - Be Careful What You Wish For
Cloud Computing Benefits Procurement in Two Ways
Balancing Customization and Business Process Change in an...
Benjamin Ho, Deputy Procurement Officer, City of Chicago Department of Procurement Services
High Performing SRM Cultures Require Technology
Ryan Nied, Executive Consultant, State of Flux
Partnering with Procurement to Increase Automation
Aaron G. Thum, Executive Director, Procurement and Vendor Management, GardaWorld Cash Services
Aligning Procurement Teams with Data
Jeff Stites, CIO, Diamond Foods
Thank you for Subscribing to CIO Applications Weekly Brief
How Is Direct And Indirect Procurement Different From Each Other?
Fremont, CA: Even though direct and indirect procurement has different aims that necessitate different approaches, understanding how the two compare can aid retailers, distributors, and manufacturers in developing an efficient supply chain policy.
When most major organizations were unable to keep up with rising operating expenses, the notion of procurement was born as a way to incorporate purchasing into supply chain management and save money.
Procurement dates back to October 1983, when Peter Kraljic realized that instead of being viewed as an additional component in the supply chain, acquiring things in a firm could be considered an integral aspect of strategy creation. Before this transformation, businesses thought procurement to be only a support function for the supply chain. However, two distinct professions, known as direct and indirect procurement or expenditure, arose from the core notion of procurement throughout time.
Even though the two branches have different aims that necessitate different approaches, understanding how they compare can aid retailers, distributors, and manufacturers develop an efficient supply chain policy.
Procurement issues are handled directly between the procurement staff and the supplier. On the other hand, indirect procurement concerns are routed through workers to their appropriate teams before being routed through procurement if the item required is not in stock.
To further understand the variations between the two forms of spend or procurements, consider how they differ in terms of:
- Spend volume and concentration
Direct procurement concentrates funds on a few items and providers controlled by a few departments, making tracking easier. They may be documented in large quantities because this procurement method is helpful to acquire the majority of critical raw commodities.
Meanwhile, indirect spending is scattered among a company's departments, making it difficult to account for all expenses if effective spend management methods do not get implemented. That's because they're tailored to the specific demands of each department and are purchased on a case-by-case basis rather than in a batch.
- Inventory management
Materials should get retained in stock with direct purchase to provide a smooth production process and avoid delays. Because production demands are usually consistent, the stock is a beneficial resource in unforeseen delays.
On the other hand, indirect procurement is driven by demand; that is, making purchases only when needed; therefore, the costs of stocking supplies are lower than indirect procurement. That means that costs might fluctuate based on flexible requirements; therefore, holding indirect purchase supplies in stock is not recommended.
- Impact on business
Because direct spending impacts product manufacturing, any ambiguity or inaccuracy may harm a company's profitability and image. Strategists identify and address any potential discrepancies that may hurt the organization by thoroughly examining direct procurement methods.
In contrast to direct procurement, indirect procurement generally has little influence on profitability or reputation. Indirect purchase process unpredictability is manageable and may get avoided.